Yes, and these are the two risks that get talked about least when a white crown is sold to you.
It is harder than your teeth. Zirconia and other modern ceramics are far harder than natural enamel. Every time you bite, that crown is grinding against a natural tooth or an existing restoration. It can abrade the tooth opposite and the neighbours it contacts, and in a heavy bite or a grinder it can crack them. Polishing the ceramic reduces the wear, but it does not remove the underlying mismatch: hard material against soft material wears the softer one. Gold is the opposite — it is close to enamel in hardness and wears at roughly the same rate as the teeth around it, which is why it is the kindest material in the mouth.
When ceramic fails, it fails suddenly. Metal is ductile: under extreme force it gives slightly rather than breaking. A gold crown cannot crack, chip or shatter — that failure mode simply does not exist for it. Ceramic is brittle — it has no give, so it chips or splits without warning. And because the crown is bonded to the tooth, the fracture often runs on into the tooth itself. A cracked tooth under a broken ceramic crown may be restorable — or may have to be extracted. That is a bad outcome for what began as a cosmetic preference on a tooth nobody sees.
There is one more thing worth knowing: an all-ceramic crown is not pure ceramic in your mouth. It has to be bonded in place with resin cement — the same monomer chemistry, including BPA-related compounds, that we warn about in white fillings. Gold needs no such bonding: it is cemented conventionally and is one of the most biologically inert materials known to medicine.
On a molar or premolar, this trade is not worth making. Gold cannot break, does not chew up the teeth around it, cannot take a tooth with it when it fails, and puts nothing questionable in your mouth.